Model View Presenter (MVP) design pattern close look - Part 2 - Passive View

re: Model View Presenter (MVP) design pattern close look - Part 2 - Passive View

peter — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 00:41:58 GMT

Hi! The link seems to be dead.. can you please update as I'm interested in following this series..

blog.vuscode.com/.../model-view-presenter-mvp-design-pattern-close-look-part-1-passive-view.aspx

Thanks

re: Model View Presenter (MVP) design pattern close look - Part 2 - Passive View

akinosakurako — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:06:59 GMT

......View contains the Presenter instance (view "knows" presenter) ......

==============================================

Thereis not necessary for this. In my Project Design, I add another Class Called "ViewLoader" to Coordinate the relationship between View and Presenter. So, view "don't knows" presenter at all.

re: Model View Presenter (MVP) design pattern close look - Part 2 - Passive View

Kilani — Mon, 07 Sep 2009 12:41:41 GMT

Great post keep em coming!

re: Model View Presenter (MVP) design pattern close look - Part 2 - Passive View

Joseph Marinaccio — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:28:28 GMT

Thanks for a great article. It is a great help for a current project.

Model View Presenter (MVP) – Tips from trenches (TFT) – Base types(Part 1)

VusCode - Coding dreams since 1998! — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:47:40 GMT

RAD tooling style Microsoft is supporting last couple of years usually leads to the code where presentation and bossiness logic are mixed and tightly coupled which makes testability, maintainability and sustainability much more harder then they should

re: Model View Presenter (MVP) design pattern close look - Part 2 - Passive View

malovicn — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:28:49 GMT

Alex,

As for my grammar, I am very well aware of that... Unfortunately, you cannot find here in Prague a lot of native English speakers willing to proof read my mumblings. One of my US colleagues offered help and he started editing some of my more recent blog posts (Design for testability series) but he is busy with his own stuff so this things get slow.

If anyone reading this is willing to contribute, send me an email on nikola.malovic@google.com

As for the purpose of article, this was intend to be article about MVP (not TDD). Once you have presenters separated it is quite easy to test them. Check out one of my old blog posts showing how to do that: blog.vuscode.com/.../tdd-rhino-mocks-part-1-introduction.aspx

It’s a bit outdated (Rhino mock syntax) but it should be still working and illustrative enough

Thanks for kind words!

Nikola

re: Model View Presenter (MVP) design pattern close look - Part 2 - Passive View

malovicn — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:19:40 GMT

Sunita,

Everything is possible :)

I could imagine you using passive view for some “more critical” screens and “supervising controller” for the simple “forms over data” screen

re: Model View Presenter (MVP) design pattern close look - Part 2 - Passive View

Alex Ellis — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:38:31 GMT

This is an interesting article Nikola. I like the clear headings, diagrams and supporting code samples. I would recommend getting a native English speaker to proof read your posts. They have great content, but the grammatical errors make it seem unprofessional.

This is an article about using TDD and a unit testable pattern, but the source code contains zero unit tests.

If I am to be convinced to use this pattern to help with unit testing, I would expect some clear examples to be given in the article also.

re: Model View Presenter (MVP) design pattern close look - Part 2 - Passive View

Sunita — Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:04:43 GMT

Hi,

This is a good one. I have a question , Is it possible to use both the patterns in a single application ? I mean can I use Passive for some screens and supervising controller for some screens ?.

Thank you .

my email : sunijob@yahoo.com

H??? th???ng qu???n l?? kh??ch s???n « L?? Qu?? L???c’s Weblog

H??? th???ng qu???n l?? kh??ch s???n « L?? Qu?? L???c’s Weblog — Sat, 20 Sep 2008 01:40:39 GMT

Pingback from H??? th???ng qu???n l?? kh??ch s???n « L?? Qu?? L???c’s Weblog