Comments on: TDD – Rhino Mocks – Part 1 – Introduction

By: malovicn

malovicn — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:31:09 +0000

Menahem,

I'll admit it's been a while I've checked out TypeMock but if they improve the "free user experience" by adding some strong typing feature I would be glad to give it a shoot

By: dotnetguts

dotnetguts — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:21:28 +0000

Good Information,

Thanks.

DotNetGuts

http://dotnetguts.blogspot.com

By: Menahem Cohen

Menahem Cohen — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:30:35 +0000

Have you heared about the new Typemock API?

By: malovicn

malovicn — Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:08:51 +0000

Menahem,

I have heard and work with it a bit but the experience of working with it without NaturalMock is much worst (no strong typing) then the Rhino Mock experience...

I am aware of things you can do with TypeMock but the price (comparing to the fact that RhinoMocks are free) is "no sell" point for me

By: Menahem Cohen

Menahem Cohen — Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:41:12 +0000

Hi...

Have you heard about Typemock.

Using Typemock Framework you do much more. For example:

mock static methods and more - see the site.

Also you do not have to "wrap" methods to interfaces

By: malovicn

malovicn — Thu, 27 Dec 2007 21:39:36 +0000

Lars,

It was just me misspeling words

Spay => spy

(Proxies are spying and reporting events occurring on mocks)

By: Lars Zeb

Lars Zeb — Thu, 27 Dec 2007 20:36:12 +0000

Nikola,

Thanks for the series – it's been very helpful.

Can you tell me what are "spays"?

Thanks